10. REDUCED INEQUALITIES

Factors associated with the perception of ease and intention to practice female genital mutilation on daughters: A cross-sectional study of cross-border communities in Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Uganda

Factors associated with the perception of ease and intention to practice female genital mutilation on daughters: A cross-sectional study of cross-border communities in Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Uganda
Written by ZJbTFBGJ2T

Factors associated with the perception of ease and intention to …  United Nations Population Fund

Factors associated with the perception of ease and intention to practice female genital mutilation on daughters: A cross-sectional study of cross-border communities in Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Uganda

Study on Cross-Border Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) Practice

This report aims to address the issue of cross-border female genital mutilation (FGM) practice. Cross-border FGM refers to the act of communities crossing national borders to perform FGM, in order to circumvent laws and avoid prosecution. The purpose of this study is to analyze data from a recent cross-border study conducted in the border communities of Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Uganda. The study aims to identify factors associated with the perception of the ease of cross-border FGM and the intention to perform FGM on daughters and female relatives in these communities.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. Goal 3: Good Health and Well-being – This study directly relates to SDG 3, as it addresses the harmful practice of FGM and its impact on the health and well-being of girls and women.
  2. Goal 5: Gender Equality – Cross-border FGM perpetuates gender inequality by subjecting girls and women to a harmful practice that violates their rights. This study aims to shed light on the factors contributing to this practice and inform interventions for achieving gender equality.
  3. Goal 10: Reduced Inequalities – FGM disproportionately affects marginalized communities and perpetuates inequalities. By understanding the factors associated with cross-border FGM, this study can contribute to efforts aimed at reducing inequalities.
  4. Goal 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions – Cross-border FGM involves circumventing laws and avoiding prosecution. By identifying the factors influencing the perception of the ease of cross-border FGM, this study can inform strategies for strengthening institutions and promoting justice.

Key Findings

  • The study found that certain factors contribute to the perception of the ease of cross-border FGM. These include cultural norms, lack of awareness about the harmful effects of FGM, and weak enforcement of laws.
  • Participants in the study expressed intentions to perform FGM on their daughters and female relatives due to social pressure, beliefs in tradition, and the desire to maintain cultural identity.
  • The findings highlight the need for comprehensive interventions that address the root causes of cross-border FGM, such as education, awareness campaigns, and strengthening legal frameworks.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

  • SDG 5: Gender Equality
  • SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

The article discusses the issue of cross-border female genital mutilation (FGM), which is a violation of women’s rights and contributes to gender inequality. It also mentions the circumvention of laws and prosecution, indicating a need for stronger institutions and justice systems.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

  • Target 5.3: Eliminate all harmful practices, such as child, early and forced marriage and female genital mutilation
  • Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all

The article highlights the need to address cross-border FGM, which aligns with Target 5.3 of SDG 5. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing the circumvention of laws and prosecution, which relates to Target 16.3 of SDG 16.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

Yes, there are indicators mentioned in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets. However, the article does not provide specific indicators. Possible indicators could include:

  • Number of reported cross-border FGM cases
  • Percentage of communities aware of the legal consequences of cross-border FGM
  • Number of prosecutions and convictions related to cross-border FGM

These indicators would help measure progress in eliminating cross-border FGM (Target 5.3) and promoting the rule of law and equal access to justice (Target 16.3).

4. SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

SDGs Targets Indicators
SDG 5: Gender Equality Target 5.3: Eliminate all harmful practices, such as child, early and forced marriage and female genital mutilation – Number of reported cross-border FGM cases
– Percentage of communities aware of the legal consequences of cross-border FGM
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all – Number of prosecutions and convictions related to cross-border FGM

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: unfpa.org

 

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.

 

About the author

ZJbTFBGJ2T