New Data Reveals Disparity in Labor Force Participation Rates Across US States
According to recent data released on Friday, Utah has the highest labor force participation rate in the country, standing at nearly 70% when seasonally adjusted. On the other hand, Mississippi has the lowest rate at 53.9%. The labor force participation rate is a crucial indicator of the job market, representing individuals who are either employed or actively seeking employment. However, this rate can vary significantly from state to state.
Understanding the Measurement of Labor Force Participation Rate
In order to comprehend the reasons behind the contrasting rates in Utah and Mississippi, it is necessary to understand how the rate is measured. Mark Knold, the chief economist at the Utah Department of Workforce Services, explains that anyone aged 16 and older has the potential to be part of the labor force. If every individual in this age group either worked or actively searched for work, the participation rate would reach 100%.
Conversely, in Mississippi, the labor force participation rate is approximately half of Utah’s rate. Corey Miller, the state economist, attributes this disparity to factors such as illness or injury preventing individuals from working, particularly among men of prime working age. Additionally, the low level of education in Mississippi plays a role, with the population having a bachelor’s degree aged 25 and older being around 10 percentage points below the national average.
The Influence of Religion and Birth Rates
In Utah, where the labor force participation rate is 70%, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a significant influence. Economist Peter Philips from the University of Utah explains that the religion’s culture and theology encourage family formation, leading to higher birth rates. This, in turn, affects the age structure in Utah, resulting in a younger and healthier workforce.
Factors Driving Labor Force Participation Growth
According to economist Mark Knold, labor force participation has increased in Utah over the past year. This growth can be attributed to two main groups: teenagers and workers aged 55 and older. While some older individuals are returning to work due to inflation driving up prices, teenagers are opting to earn their own money instead of relying solely on their parents’ income.
Conclusion
The significant disparity in labor force participation rates between Utah and Mississippi highlights the complex factors influencing employment trends at the state level. Factors such as education, health, religion, and birth rates all play a role in shaping the labor force dynamics. Addressing these disparities aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, which aims to promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all.
Stories You Might Like
- Story 1
- Story 2
- Story 3
There’s a lot happening in the world. Through it all, Marketplace is here for you.
You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible.
Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
| SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth | Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value | Indicator 8.5.1: Average hourly earnings of female and male employees, by occupation, age, and persons with disabilities |
| SDG 4: Quality Education | Target 4.3: By 2030, ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational, and tertiary education, including university | Indicator 4.3.1: Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months |
| SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being | Target 3.4: By 2030, reduce by one-third premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and well-being | Indicator 3.4.1: Mortality rate attributed to cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes or chronic respiratory disease |
| SDG 1: No Poverty | Target 1.2: By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions | Indicator 1.2.2: Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines |
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
The article discusses the labor force participation rate, which is an important measure of the job market and is related to achieving full and productive employment and decent work for all.
SDG 4: Quality Education
The article mentions the low level of education as a factor contributing to the lower labor force participation rate in Mississippi. This is connected to the goal of ensuring equal access to quality education.
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
The article mentions that in Mississippi, many individuals are too sick or injured to work, which relates to the goal of promoting good health and well-being.
SDG 1: No Poverty
Although not directly discussed in the article, the difference in labor force participation rates between Utah and Mississippi can be linked to poverty levels, as higher labor force participation can contribute to reducing poverty.
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value
This target is relevant as the article highlights the differences in labor force participation rates between Utah and Mississippi, indicating disparities in employment opportunities and decent work.
Target 4.3: By 2030, ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational, and tertiary education, including university
This target is relevant as the article mentions the low level of education in Mississippi as a factor contributing to the lower labor force participation rate.
Target 3.4: By 2030, reduce by one-third premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and well-being
This target is indirectly connected as the article mentions that individuals in Mississippi are too sick or injured to work, indicating potential health issues affecting labor force participation.
Target 1.2: By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions
Although not directly discussed in the article, the difference in labor force participation rates between Utah and Mississippi can be linked to poverty levels, making this target relevant.
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
The article does not explicitly mention indicators related to the identified targets. However, based on the content, the following indicators can be implied:
Indicator 8.5.1: Average hourly earnings of female and male employees, by occupation, age, and persons with disabilities
This indicator can measure progress towards achieving equal pay for work of equal value, which is a part of Target 8.5.
Indicator 4.3.1: Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months
This indicator can measure progress towards ensuring equal access to quality education, which is a part of Target 4.3.
Indicator 3.4.1: Mortality rate attributed to cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes or chronic respiratory disease
This indicator can measure progress towards reducing premature mortality from non-communicable diseases, which is a part of Target 3.4.
Indicator 1.2.2: Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines
This indicator can measure progress towards reducing poverty in all its dimensions, which is a part of Target 1.2.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
| SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth | Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value | Indicator 8.5.1: Average hourly earnings of female and male employees, by occupation, age, and persons with disabilities |
| SDG 4: Quality Education | Target 4.3: By 2030, ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational, and tertiary education, including university | Indicator 4.3.1: Participation rate of youth
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together. Source: marketplace.org
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.
You may also likeAbout the author ZJbTFBGJ2T |
