Chinese ‘agroterrorism’ could threaten US ‘survival as a nation,’ expert warns – Fox News

Report on Agroterrorism Threats and Their Impact on Sustainable Development Goals

Introduction

Recent arrests of two Chinese nationals accused of smuggling a crop-killing fungus into the United States have raised significant concerns about agroterrorism and its potential to disrupt national food security. This report emphasizes the implications of such threats in the context of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly those related to zero hunger, good health and well-being, and peace, justice, and strong institutions.

Agroterrorism Defined and Expert Insights

Agroterrorism involves the intentional introduction of biological organisms or agents designed to harm the agricultural sector, thereby threatening the food supply chain. Kristofor Healey, a former Department of Homeland Security expert, highlighted that such acts could severely disrupt the United States’ agricultural economy, which is foundational to national survival.

Case Details: Smuggling of Fusarium graminearum

• Individuals Involved: Yunqing Jian, 33, and Zunyong Liu, 34, Chinese nationals arrested for smuggling and studying the fungus.
• Fungus Description: Fusarium graminearum is a toxic fungus causing “head blight” in wheat, barley, maize, and rice, leading to billions of dollars in global economic losses annually.
• Health Risks: The fungus is toxic to humans and livestock, causing vomiting, liver damage, and reproductive defects.
• Research Background: Jian was a post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan with funding linked to the People’s Republic of China.

Implications for Sustainable Development Goals

1. SDG 2: Zero Hunger
   • Agroterrorism threatens crop yields and food security, undermining efforts to end hunger and ensure access to safe, nutritious food.
   • Disruption of staple crops like wheat and rice directly impacts global food supply chains.
2. SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
   • The toxic effects of Fusarium graminearum on humans and livestock pose serious public health risks.
   • Biological threats can exacerbate health crises, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
3. SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
   • Preventing agroterrorism requires robust law enforcement and international cooperation.
   • Charges against the suspects include conspiracy, smuggling, false statements, and visa fraud, emphasizing the need for strong institutional responses.

National Security and Economic Vulnerabilities

Healey emphasized that the U.S. agricultural sector is a vulnerable part of national infrastructure. The intentional introduction of harmful biological agents by foreign adversaries could cause severe disruption to food safety and economic stability. The interconnectedness of the U.S. economy with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) further complicates these risks, especially in the event of geopolitical conflicts such as a war over Taiwan.

Recommendations for Preparedness and Policy Focus

• Increase vigilance and monitoring of biological threats to agriculture, expanding beyond traditional security concerns like weapons and explosives.
• Enhance preparedness strategies by encouraging long-term planning and resilience in food supply systems.
• Strengthen international collaboration to prevent the smuggling and misuse of biological agents.
• Integrate agroterrorism threat assessments into national security frameworks to protect critical infrastructure.

Conclusion

The arrests related to the smuggling of Fusarium graminearum underscore the urgent need to address agroterrorism as a serious threat to sustainable development. Protecting agricultural systems aligns directly with achieving multiple SDGs, including ending hunger, promoting health, and ensuring peaceful and just societies. Proactive measures and heightened awareness are essential to safeguard the United States’ food security and public health against biological threats.

1. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Addressed or Connected

1. SDG 2: Zero Hunger
   • The article discusses threats to agriculture, specifically crop-killing fungus Fusarium graminearum that affects wheat, barley, maize, and rice, which are staple food crops.
   • Agroterrorism targeting food supply directly impacts food security and agricultural productivity.
2. SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
   • The toxic effects of the fungus on humans and livestock, including vomiting, liver damage, and reproductive defects, relate to health concerns.
   • Biological threats and pandemics such as COVID-19 are referenced, highlighting public health risks.
3. SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
   • The article mentions laboratory research and development of biological organisms, implying the role of scientific innovation and infrastructure in both risks and prevention.
4. SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
   • The arrests and legal actions against individuals involved in smuggling and bioterrorism relate to justice, law enforcement, and institutional response to threats.
   • Counter-terrorism and border security efforts are highlighted.

2. Specific Targets Under Those SDGs Identified

1. SDG 2: Zero Hunger
   • Target 2.4: By 2030, ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices that increase productivity and production.
   • Target 2.1: End hunger and ensure access by all people to safe, nutritious, and sufficient food all year round.
2. SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
   • Target 3.3: End epidemics of communicable diseases and combat other communicable diseases.
   • Target 3.d: Strengthen the capacity of all countries for early warning, risk reduction, and management of national and global health risks.
3. SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
   • Target 9.b: Support domestic technology development, research, and innovation in developing countries, including measures to enhance scientific research capacity.
4. SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
   • Target 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere.
   • Target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels.
   • Target 16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels.

3. Indicators Mentioned or Implied to Measure Progress

1. For SDG 2 (Zero Hunger)
   • Indicator 2.4.1: Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustainable agriculture (implied through the focus on protecting crops from agroterrorism).
   • Indicator 2.1.1: Prevalence of undernourishment (implied risk due to disruption in food supply).
2. For SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being)
   • Indicator 3.3.1: Number of new HIV infections, tuberculosis, malaria, and neglected tropical diseases (expanded to include biological threats and epidemics like COVID-19).
   • Indicator 3.d.1: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity and health emergency preparedness (implied by the discussion on preparedness for biological threats and pandemics).
3. For SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure)
   • Indicator 9.b.1: Proportion of medium and high-tech industry value added in total value added (implied through lab research and scientific innovation).
4. For SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions)
   • Indicator 16.1.4: Proportion of population that feel safe walking alone around the area they live (implied through the impact of terrorism on public safety).
   • Indicator 16.6.2: Proportion of the population satisfied with their last experience of public services (implied through law enforcement and institutional response effectiveness).
   • Indicator 16.7.2: Proportion of population who believe decision-making is inclusive and responsive (implied through transparency and accountability in handling bioterrorism threats).

4. Table of SDGs, Targets and Indicators

Source: foxnews.com