49 Adult Literacy Statistics and Facts – nu.edu

Report on Institutional Policies and Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals

Introduction: Framework for Engagement and Sustainable Development

This report analyzes the terms and conditions of National University, focusing on its alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The institution’s policies regarding data privacy, user consent, and access to information reflect a commitment to building strong institutions (SDG 16), providing quality education (SDG 4), and reducing inequalities (SDG 10).

Commitment to Quality Education (SDG 4)

The institution’s operational framework is fundamentally tied to providing accessible and quality education, a core tenet of SDG 4. Key elements supporting this goal include:

• Access to Information: By engaging with prospective students, the university provides crucial information regarding degree programs, facilitating access to higher education and lifelong learning opportunities.
• Student Code of Conduct: Acknowledgment of the Student Code of Conduct, located in the University Catalog, is required. This establishes a clear framework for behavior and academic integrity, which is essential for a high-quality learning environment.
• Program Availability: The institution notes that certain degree programs may not be available in all states, highlighting an awareness of regional disparities in educational access that must be addressed to achieve universal quality education.

Upholding Rights and Ensuring Institutional Accountability (SDG 16)

The terms and conditions demonstrate a robust commitment to creating accountable and transparent institutions, directly supporting SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). This is achieved through several mechanisms:

1. Informed Consent: The institution operates in compliance with legal standards such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), ensuring that contact with individuals is based on express written consent.
2. Right to Revoke Consent: Users are explicitly informed of their right to revoke consent at any time, reinforcing individual autonomy and data sovereignty.
3. Data Protection Governance: The appointment of a Data Protection Officer provides a clear point of contact for privacy-related concerns, establishing a formal governance structure for data management.
4. Transparency in Data Processing: The policy clearly states how personal data will be used, including its potential transfer and storage in the United States, ensuring transparency in its operations.

Promoting Inclusivity and Reducing Inequalities (SDG 10)

A significant focus is placed on ensuring equitable access, which is central to SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).

• Accessibility Statement: The mandatory acknowledgment of the Accessibility Statement underscores the university’s commitment to ensuring that individuals with disabilities have equal access to its information and resources.
• International Data Handling: The policies address individuals submitting data from outside the United States, acknowledging the need for clear protocols that respect global data subjects and work towards reducing informational inequalities across borders.

Relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

The issues discussed in the article, primarily revolving around data privacy, user consent, access to information, and accessibility, are connected to the following SDGs:

• SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions: The article heavily emphasizes legal frameworks, data protection rights, and public access to institutional policies. It details the user’s rights under laws like the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, outlines the role of a Data Protection Officer, and requires acknowledgment of the Privacy Policy and Student Code of Conduct. These elements are central to building effective, accountable, and transparent institutions.
• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities: The explicit mention of and requirement to review the “Accessibility Statement” connects directly to reducing inequalities. This statement implies that the institution has policies in place to ensure that its services and information are accessible to all individuals, including those with disabilities, thereby promoting inclusion.
• SDG 4: Quality Education: By ensuring access to information such as the “Catalog” and “Student Code of Conduct,” and by providing an “Accessibility Statement,” the institution is working to create an inclusive and effective learning environment. Accessibility is a key component of ensuring equitable quality education for all learners.

Specific SDG Targets

Based on the article’s content, the following specific targets can be identified:

• SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

  • Target 16.10: Ensure public access to information and protect fundamental freedoms, in accordance with national legislation and international agreements. The article is a manifestation of this target. It provides users with access to key institutional documents (“Privacy Policy,” “Accessibility Statement,” “Catalog,” “Student Code of Conduct”) and informs them of their fundamental rights regarding their personal data and how it is used, referencing U.S. laws and providing a mechanism to revoke consent.

• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

  • Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status. The requirement for the user to acknowledge the “Accessibility Statement” indicates an institutional commitment to the inclusion of people with disabilities, which is a core component of this target.

• SDG 4: Quality Education

  • Target 4.a: Build and upgrade education facilities that are child, disability and gender sensitive and provide safe, non-violent, inclusive and effective learning environments for all. The “Accessibility Statement” directly supports the goal of creating an inclusive learning environment that is sensitive to disability, ensuring that educational resources and platforms are usable by all students.

Implied Indicators for Measuring Progress

The article implies several indicators that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets:

• For Target 16.10:

  • Existence and implementation of policies on public access to information: The article itself serves as an indicator. The requirement for users to acknowledge they have “read and reviewed” the Privacy Policy, Terms & Conditions, and the Catalog demonstrates the implementation of a policy for public access to information.
  • Establishment of data protection mechanisms: The mention of a “Data Protection Officer” and a clear process for revoking consent (“[email protected]”) are indicators of an institution’s capacity to protect fundamental freedoms related to data privacy.

• For Target 10.2 & 4.a:

  • Adoption of institutional accessibility policies: The existence of an “Accessibility Statement” that users must review is a direct indicator that the institution has adopted policies aimed at ensuring inclusion and accessibility for people with disabilities.

Source: nu.edu