Changing the Game: Study quantifies global impact of local carbon-reduction efforts – Local News Matters

Report on Philanthropic Investment in Climate Mitigation and Sustainable Development Goals

Executive Summary: Quantifying the Impact of Climate Philanthropy

A new study, “Changing the Game,” establishes a direct correlation between philanthropic funding and climate change mitigation, finding that for every dollar invested in community-based mitigation efforts, one metric ton of carbon dioxide can be abated by 2030. This research provides a critical framework for achieving SDG 13: Climate Action by demonstrating a tangible return on investment for local initiatives.

The report was funded and supported by a partnership of key organizations, reflecting the importance of SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals in mobilizing resources for sustainable development. These partners include:

• The Marin Community Foundation
• The MacArthur Foundation
• The Equation Campaign

The Scale of the Climate Challenge and the Role of Local Action

To limit global warming and prevent catastrophic climate impacts, “The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal” report (2024) estimates a global requirement of 7 to 9 gigatons of annual carbon removal by 2050. The “Changing the Game” study posits that local and community-level actions are not merely supplementary but are, in fact, the primary drivers of the policy solutions needed to meet this global target. This approach directly supports SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities by empowering local actors to build resilience and implement sustainable solutions from the ground up.

Analysis of Community-Based Mitigation Strategies

The “Changing the Game” report analyzed 15 successful, quantifiable carbon mitigation efforts across the United States and Canada. These initiatives demonstrate effective pathways for achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals through targeted action. The strategies fall into several key categories:

1. Legislative and Policy Advocacy: This includes state and local laws, such as California’s mandate for zero-emissions trucks, which advance SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure by promoting clean technology and sustainable industrial practices.
2. Renewable Energy Development: The development of solar and wind energy facilities is central to achieving SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy. By increasing renewable energy uptake at the community level—on schools, medical centers, and community centers—localities can reduce emissions, lower energy costs, and enhance grid resilience.
3. Supply-Side Interventions: Actions aimed at reducing fossil fuel production, such as the closure of coal plants and halting pipeline construction, directly contribute to SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production by disrupting unsustainable energy systems at their source.
4. Community Transition Programs: Quasi-governmental programs that assist communities in adopting sustainable technologies foster a just transition, aligning with the principles of SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth by creating opportunities in the green economy.

Local Action as a Driver of National and Global Progress

Rhea Suh, President and CEO of the Marin Community Foundation, highlights that despite an increasingly partisan national political climate regarding environmental policy, progress continues to be driven by state and local initiatives. This underscores the critical importance of community-based strategies as a resilient and effective mechanism for advancing the climate agenda. By focusing on local opportunities in renewable energy, sustainable transportation, and housing, communities can achieve significant returns on investment while building a more sustainable and equitable future, thereby making substantive contributions to the global Sustainable Development Goals.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy

  The article directly addresses this goal by discussing the development of renewable energy sources like solar and wind facilities, the transition away from fossil fuels by closing coal plants and stopping pipelines, and making communities more energy independent.

• SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities

  The core theme of the article is the power of local, community-based efforts in climate mitigation. It mentions making community centers, medical centers, and schools more resilient through solar power, improving transportation systems, and addressing housing challenges, all of which are central to creating sustainable communities.

• SDG 13: Climate Action

  This is the primary SDG addressed. The entire article focuses on climate mitigation efforts, the reduction of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, and the implementation of climate policies at local, state, and national levels.

• SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals

  The article highlights the importance of partnerships. The “Changing the Game” study itself is a result of a partnership between foundations (Marin Community Foundation, MacArthur Foundation) and an advocacy organization (Equation Campaign). It emphasizes collaboration between philanthropic donors, community groups, and different levels of government to achieve climate goals.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
  • Target 7.2: By 2030, increase substantially the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix. This is identified through the article’s mention of “renewable energy developments like solar and wind energy facilities” and the question posed: “When every community center, every medical center, every school has a solar panel on it, what happens to the overall emissions?”
  • Target 7.a: By 2030, enhance international cooperation to facilitate access to clean energy research and technology… and promote investment in energy infrastructure and clean energy technology. The funding from foundations for community-based climate actions, including renewable energy uptake, directly supports this target.
• SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
  • Target 11.6: By 2030, reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities. The article’s focus on local carbon mitigation efforts, such as California’s law for zero-emissions trucks and improving transportation systems, directly contributes to this target.
  • Target 11.b: By 2020, substantially increase the number of cities and human settlements adopting and implementing integrated policies and plans towards… mitigation and adaptation to climate change, resilience to disasters. The article showcases how local and state areas are driving climate policy and progress, such as “state and local legislation, like California’s law that requires manufacturers to sell zero-emissions trucks.”
• SDG 13: Climate Action
  • Target 13.2: Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning. The article discusses this at multiple levels, from President Biden’s administration enacting “major climate policies” to state and local areas continuing progress even when national policy swings.
  • Target 13.3: Improve education, awareness-raising and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation. The “Changing the Game” report itself is an tool for this, aiming to show donors and communities that “anything local can make a difference globally.”
  • Target 13.a: Implement the commitment… to a goal of mobilizing jointly $100 billion annually by 2020… to address the needs of developing countries in the context of meaningful mitigation actions. While not about developing countries, the article’s central theme of mobilizing philanthropic dollars for mitigation efforts reflects the spirit of this target, focusing on financing climate action.
• SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals
  • Target 17.3: Mobilize additional financial resources for developing countries from multiple sources. The article provides a direct example of mobilizing philanthropic funds (“every philanthropic dollar spent”) from foundations to support climate mitigation, which is a key aspect of this target’s focus on finance mobilization.
  • Target 17.17: Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships. The collaboration between the Marin Community Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, and the Equation Campaign to fund the study is a clear example of a civil society partnership aimed at achieving sustainable development.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

• Cost-Effectiveness of Funding: The article explicitly states a key indicator from the study: “One metric ton of carbon dioxide can be reduced from the earth’s atmosphere by 2030 for every philanthropic dollar spent on mitigation efforts.” This is a direct measure of the financial efficiency of climate action (Indicator for Targets 13.a, 17.3).
• Carbon Removal Goals: A global indicator is cited from “The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal” report: “7 to 9 gigatons of carbon removal will be required globally each year by 2050.” This sets a clear quantitative goal for climate mitigation (Indicator for Target 13.2).
• Implementation of Renewable Energy Projects: The article implies progress can be measured by the number of renewable energy installations. It mentions “solar and wind energy facilities” and installing solar panels on “every community center, every medical center, every school” as measurable actions (Indicator for Target 7.2).
• Policy and Legislative Actions: Progress is measured by the enactment and success of specific policies. Examples given include “California’s law that requires manufacturers to sell zero-emissions trucks,” actions like “closing coal plants around Chicago,” and “stopping the Keystone XL pipeline” (Indicator for Targets 11.b, 13.2).
• Return on Investment (ROI): The article refers to a table in the report showing the “return on investment of 15 national community-based climate actions.” This ROI, likely measured in tons of CO2 reduced per dollar invested, serves as a key performance indicator for the effectiveness of different strategies (Indicator for Targets 13.a, 17.3).

4. SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Summary

Source: localnewsmatters.org