How to help reduced financial aid offices better support students – University Business

Report on AI Integration in Higher Education and Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals

Introduction: Advancing Quality Education and Innovation (SDG 4, SDG 9)

A recent annual survey conducted by Education Dynamics and the Online and Professional Education Association reveals mounting pressure on higher education institutions to integrate Artificial Intelligence (AI) to maintain competitiveness. This trend towards technological adoption is critical for advancing Sustainable Development Goal 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) within the education sector. Furthermore, it directly supports the objectives of SDG 4 (Quality Education) by enhancing the operational frameworks that provide access to learning opportunities. The survey respondents included specialists in marketing, enrollment management, student success, and admissions.

Key Findings on AI Adoption and Institutional Performance

The data indicates a rapid acceleration in the use of AI, which correlates with significant performance gains and contributes to several SDGs.

• Increased Adoption Rate: Institutional adoption of AI and emerging technologies has increased by 15 percentage points over the past year, with nearly two-thirds of surveyed offices now utilizing these tools.
• Enhanced Operational Efficiency (SDG 8): A primary driver for this adoption is heightened performance. 62% of respondents reported improved efficiency, and 52% noted improved work quality, contributing to SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) by fostering higher levels of economic productivity.
• Positive Enrollment Impact (SDG 4): Consequently, 47% of respondents stated that AI has had a positive effect on overall enrollment operations, including increasing student numbers and reaching a wider pool of prospective learners, thereby promoting target 4.3 of SDG 4 regarding equal access to tertiary education.

Strategic Applications of AI for Sustainable Educational Outreach

Respondents identified several key applications of AI as being highly effective in transforming marketing and enrollment management. These applications are instrumental in creating more inclusive and accessible educational pathways.

1. Content, Lead Generation, and Messaging: These were rated as the most effective uses of AI, enabling institutions to communicate more effectively with potential students.
2. Predictive Analytics and Campaign Optimization: AI facilitates the generation of predictive analytics and the optimization of real-time campaigns, allowing for more targeted and equitable outreach strategies.
3. Chatbots and Virtual Assistants: The deployment of AI-powered assistants provides immediate support to prospective students, removing barriers and improving access to information, in line with the principles of SDG 4.

Barriers to Adoption and the Need for Workforce Development (SDG 4, SDG 8)

Despite the benefits, significant hurdles inhibit the widespread and equitable adoption of AI technology.

• Systemic Constraints: Resource limitations, technical barriers, and cultural resistance remain primary obstacles for many institutions.
• Deficit in Staff Upskilling: A critical challenge is the lack of institutional support for workforce development. Nearly half of the respondents reported their institution has no plan to upskill and support staff in adopting new tools. This gap directly impacts the achievement of SDG 4.4 (relevant skills for employment) and SDG 8 (full and productive employment).

Competitive Landscape and Workforce Implications (SDG 8)

The pace of AI adoption has created a sense of competitive urgency and has clear implications for the workforce, aligning with the goals of promoting decent work environments.

• Perceived Competitive Lag: Over one-third of respondents believe their institution is lagging behind its peers in technology adoption, while only one in five feel they are ahead.
• Impact on Staff Retention: The integration of technology is linked to creating a desirable work environment. More than a third of respondents indicated they would be more likely to remain at an institution that actively adopts and invests in new technology, highlighting a key factor in achieving SDG 8.

The report concludes that strategic investment, institutional alignment, and a commitment to staff development are necessary to overcome these hurdles and fully leverage AI to advance the Sustainable Development Goals related to education, innovation, and decent work.

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 4: Quality Education

  The article is centered on higher education institutions and their use of technology to improve operations, specifically in marketing and enrollment. The goal of these efforts is to increase student enrollment and reach more prospective students, which directly relates to providing access to quality tertiary education.

• SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

  The article discusses how AI integration improves workplace productivity and efficiency. It also touches upon the importance of upskilling staff to adapt to new technologies and how the adoption of AI can affect staff retention, linking to the concepts of decent work and economic productivity.

• SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

  This goal is relevant as the article focuses on the adoption of new technology (AI) and innovation within a specific industry (higher education). It highlights the drive for technological upgrading and the barriers, such as resource constraints and technical issues, that institutions face in building their technological infrastructure.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• Under SDG 4: Quality Education

  • Target 4.3: By 2030, ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational and tertiary education, including university. The article’s focus on using AI to “help increase enrollment or reach more prospective students” directly supports the aim of improving access to tertiary education.
  • Target 4.4: By 2030, substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship. The article points out that “nearly half of respondents reported that their institution does not have a plan to upskill and support staff in adopting new tools,” highlighting a critical need related to this target.

• Under SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

  • Target 8.2: Achieve higher levels of economic productivity through diversification, technological upgrading and innovation. The article provides direct evidence for this target, stating that AI integration led to “improved efficiency (62%) and improved quality (52%) of work.”
  • Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men. The mention that “More than a third of respondents said they were more likely to remain at an institution that is adopting the technology” connects technological adoption to staff retention and job satisfaction, which are components of decent work.

• Under SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

  • Target 9.c: Significantly increase access to information and communications technology. The article’s main theme is the adoption of AI and emerging technology in higher education. The discussion of “resource constraints, technical barriers and cultural resistance” as inhibitors to widespread adoption directly relates to the challenges of increasing access to and integration of new ICT.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

• For Target 4.3:

  An implied indicator is the rate of student enrollment. The article states that nearly half (47%) of respondents said AI had a “positive effect on their overall enrollment operations, whether it means helping increase enrollment or reach more prospective students.”

• For Target 4.4:

  A direct indicator is the proportion of staff receiving training or upskilling. The article provides a negative measure for this, noting that “nearly half of respondents reported that their institution does not have a plan to upskill and support staff.”

• For Target 8.2:

  The article provides direct quantitative indicators for productivity: the percentage of improvement in work efficiency (62%) and the percentage of improvement in work quality (52%) resulting from AI integration.

• For Target 8.5:

  An implied indicator is the staff retention rate. The article suggests this could be measured by comparing institutions that adopt AI versus those that do not, as “More than a third of respondents said they were more likely to remain at an institution that is adopting the technology.”

• For Target 9.c:

  A direct indicator is the rate of technology adoption by institutions. The article states that institutional adoption of AI or other emerging technology “increased at a similar rate” to the 15 percentage point increase among individuals, from 2024 to 2025.

4. Table of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: universitybusiness.com