Asking Eric: Must I forgive mom’s physical abuse as a child just because dementia is getting worse? – Syracuse.com

Analysis of Intra-Familial Conflict and Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals

Case Summary and SDG Implications

A report has been filed concerning a significant intra-familial dispute characterized by inequitable asset distribution and subsequent criminal activity. The case highlights critical challenges to achieving several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at the micro-community level of the family unit.

• Asset Distribution Inequality: The matriarch of the family engaged in preferential treatment, bequeathing valuable heirlooms to a younger son over the eldest. This action directly contravenes the principles of SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities, which seeks to ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome.
• Erosion of Security and Justice: The matriarch is further accused of theft, stealing newly acquired items from the aggrieved parties. This act undermines SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, as it represents a breakdown of law, trust, and security within the primary social institution of the family.
• Impact on Well-being: The resulting “emotional chaos” and “family toxicity” have a direct negative impact on the mental health of the affected individuals, working against the aims of SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being.

Strategic Interventions for Sustainable Familial Relations

The recommended course of action focuses on establishing boundaries and restructuring interactions to align with key SDG principles for a more peaceful, just, and sustainable outcome.

1. Promote Peace and Justice (SDG 16): The core issue is a lack of accountability and a hostile environment. To restore a sense of justice and peace, it is advised to cease interactions within private, unsecured spaces.
   • Do not provide the offending party with opportunities to commit further crimes within the home.
   • This boundary-setting enforces a rule of law and protects personal property, fundamental tenets of SDG 16.
2. Ensure Health and Well-being (SDG 3): Protecting the family from emotional and psychological harm is paramount.
   • Limiting contact and controlling the environment of interaction is a necessary measure to safeguard mental well-being.
   • This strategy mitigates the negative health impacts of a toxic relationship, thereby supporting SDG 3.
3. Foster Safe and Resilient Communities (SDG 11): The family unit can be viewed as a micro-community. The proposed solution involves utilizing safe, inclusive, and resilient public spaces for any necessary interaction.
   • Meeting in neutral venues, such as restaurants, leverages public oversight as a deterrent to illicit behavior.
   • This approach transforms the engagement into one that relies on the safety and accountability of the wider community, reflecting the goals of SDG 11.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

1. SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
   • This goal is the most relevant as the article centers on a breakdown of peace within a family unit and the commission of crimes. The mother-in-law’s actions, described as “theft” and “committing crimes,” directly relate to the “justice” aspect of this SDG. Her self-perception as “judge and jury” undermines the principles of law and fair process that are central to SDG 16.
2. SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
   • The article highlights significant emotional and psychological distress. Phrases like “family toxicity” and “emotional chaos” point to a negative impact on the mental well-being of the family members. The advice given is a strategy to protect their well-being, connecting the issue to the promotion of mental health.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

1. Under SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
   • Target 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. While not physical, the “family toxicity” and “emotional chaos” described in the article can be interpreted as a form of psychological violence that the family is experiencing.
   • Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all. The mother-in-law is described as a “thief” who is “committing crimes.” Her behavior is a direct violation of the rule of law. Her belief that she is the “judge and jury” shows a disregard for established legal and social norms, and the family is seeking a form of justice or resolution for these actions.
2. Under SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
   • Target 3.4: By 2030, reduce by one third premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and well-being. The core problem described is the severe emotional distress (“feeling ripped off,” “emotional chaos”) caused by the mother-in-law’s behavior. The advice to set “emotional” and “physical boundaries” is a direct strategy to protect and promote the family’s mental health and well-being.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

1. For SDG 16 Targets:
   • An implied indicator for Target 16.1 is the frequency and intensity of conflict and “emotional chaos” within the family. Progress would be measured by a reduction in these toxic interactions.
   • An indicator for Target 16.3 is the number of criminal acts (theft) committed by the mother-in-law. The article states she “has become a thief and cheers herself up by stealing from us.” A reduction of these incidents to zero would indicate progress towards upholding the rule of law within their home. The family is already taking “precautions against financial/identity theft,” which is a form of monitoring this indicator.
2. For SDG 3 Target:
   • An implied indicator for Target 3.4 is the self-reported level of emotional well-being of the letter writer and her husband. The letter expresses high distress. Implementing the suggested boundaries and observing a subsequent improvement in their ability to “enjoy our consolation silver” without anxiety would signify progress.

4. Table of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: syracuse.com