What the Trump Economy Means for Women – hermoney.com

Report on the Politicization of Economic Data and its Impact on Sustainable Development Goals

Recent events concerning the politicization of economic data from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) present a significant threat to evidence-based policymaking and the advancement of key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The dismissal of the BLS head following an unfavorable jobs report, coupled with claims of data manipulation, jeopardizes the financial security of vulnerable populations, particularly women, and undermines progress towards gender equality (SDG 5), decent work (SDG 8), reduced inequalities (SDG 10), and strong institutions (SDG 16).

Undermining Institutional Integrity: A Challenge to SDG 16

The reliability of national statistics is a cornerstone of effective governance and is central to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). Political interference in the functions of bodies like the BLS erodes public trust and compromises the data essential for sound economic management.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Data Process

The BLS methodology for generating jobs reports is designed for accuracy and timeliness through a multi-stage process:

1. An initial estimate is released based on early survey responses from approximately 60% of a 100,000-employer sample. This provides timely, albeit preliminary, data to inform decision-making.
2. Two subsequent revisions are released in the following months as more survey data is collected.
3. The third and final estimate incorporates data from nearly 90% of the surveyed employers, providing a more complete and accurate picture of the labor market.

Political Interference and Institutional Weakness

The abrupt dismissal of the BLS chief following a jobs report perceived as negative, and subsequent claims that the data was “rigged,” represents a direct challenge to the bureau’s institutional independence. Such actions risk creating a climate where data is either unreliable or perceived as such, crippling the ability to form policy based on objective evidence and directly contravening the objective of SDG 16 to build effective, accountable, and transparent institutions.

Economic Consequences and Threats to SDG 8 and SDG 10

The integrity of labor market data is intrinsically linked to national economic strategy and the goal of achieving sustainable growth and reducing inequality.

Contractionary Policies and the Labor Market

According to analysis by labor economist Kathryn Edwards, several administration policies are inherently contractionary and pose a threat to SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth). These policies include:

• Significant reductions to the federal workforce.
• The deportation of immigrant labor.
• The implementation of tariffs and initiation of trade wars.

These actions are projected to shrink the economy, create labor shortages, increase consumer prices, and harm workers, thereby impeding progress on creating decent work for all.

Risks of Uninformed Policymaking

Operating without reliable economic data is akin to “flying blind” into an economic storm. The lack of credible statistics prevents policymakers from accurately diagnosing economic weaknesses and implementing corrective measures. This uncertainty undermines efforts to foster the sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth envisioned in SDG 8. Furthermore, since BLS data is used to calculate adjustments for Social Security benefits and tax brackets, its corruption threatens to exacerbate economic disparities, working against the core principle of SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).

Disproportionate Impacts on Women and Setbacks for SDG 5

The erosion of data integrity has a pronounced and negative impact on women’s economic standing, representing a significant setback for SDG 5 (Gender Equality).

Financial Security and Gender Equality

Women’s financial security is particularly vulnerable to the manipulation of economic data. Key metrics influenced by BLS reports, such as cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security benefits and the prices of essential goods, have a disproportionate impact on women, who often face a wage gap and may rely more heavily on social safety nets. Compromising this data undermines the economic empowerment of women, a primary target of SDG 5.

Policy Gaps and Opportunities for Progress

The report highlights that a lack of political action on issues critical to women’s economic participation, such as the prohibitive cost of childcare, represents a major policy failure. Addressing such challenges is crucial for advancing both SDG 5 and SDG 8. The existence of tested, effective policy solutions that have not been implemented at a national level suggests that significant progress is achievable. An optimistic outlook posits that these unaddressed problems represent clear opportunities to advance the Sustainable Development Goals through focused, evidence-based policy initiatives.

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 5: Gender Equality

  The article’s central theme is the impact of economic policy and data integrity on women’s financial security. It explicitly states that when economic data is politicized, “it’s women who stand to lose the most,” and it discusses challenges like the “crippling cost of childcare” and solutions like financial wellness programs for women.

• SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

  The discussion is heavily focused on the labor market, referencing the “disappointing jobs report,” a “dangerously weak labor market,” and economic policies that “hurt workers” and “make the economy smaller.” This directly relates to the goal of achieving full employment and sustainable economic growth.

• SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

  A core issue is the erosion of trust in a key public institution, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The article highlights the firing of the BLS head and accusations that data was “rigged,” which undermines the principles of effective, accountable, and transparent institutions essential for stable governance and economic planning.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

1. SDG 5: Gender Equality

   • Target 5.4: Recognize and value unpaid care and domestic work through the provision of public services, infrastructure and social protection policies.

     This target is identified through the statement by labor economist Kathryn Edwards, who asks, “What have policymakers done to address the crisis that is the crippling cost of childcare? It’s nothing.” This highlights a failure to provide public services and policies that address a key barrier to women’s economic participation.

   • Target 5.a: Undertake reforms to give women equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to… financial services.

     This target is connected to the article’s promotion of “FinanceFixx” and “InvestingFixx,” which are described as a “financial coaching program” and an “investing club for women.” These initiatives are designed to increase women’s “financial confidence” and help them “grow their wealth,” directly addressing access to financial services and control over economic resources.

2. SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

   • Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men… and equal pay for work of equal value.

     The article’s focus on the “jobs report,” the “number of jobs added in the economy,” and concerns about a “dangerously weak labor market” directly relates to the goal of achieving full and productive employment.

   • Target 8.3: Promote development-oriented policies that support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity and innovation.

     This target is addressed negatively. The article describes the administration’s policies—slashing the federal workforce, deporting immigrants, and starting trade wars—as “contractionary,” meaning they “will make the economy smaller” and “hurt workers,” which is the opposite of promoting decent job creation and productive activities.

3. SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

   • Target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels.

     The article directly addresses this target by discussing the politicization of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The firing of its head and claims that the jobs report was “rigged” are presented as a “catastrophic” move that undermines the credibility and transparency of a vital government institution.

   • Target 16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels.

     This is highlighted by the concern that without reliable data, “we’re flying blind.” The article explains that BLS data is essential for informing decisions, from individual financial planning (Social Security, tax brackets) to macroeconomic policy. When data becomes unreliable, it prevents responsive and informed decision-making.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

1. For SDG 5 (Gender Equality)

   • Indicator for Target 5.4: Government policies and spending on affordable childcare.

     The article implies this indicator when Kathryn Edwards states that “nothing” has been done by policymakers to address the cost of childcare. Progress would be measured by the existence and funding of such policies.

   • Indicator for Target 5.a: Women’s financial literacy and participation in financial markets.

     This is implied by the promotion of programs aimed at increasing women’s “financial confidence” and helping them invest to “grow their wealth.” An increase in the number of women participating in such programs or reporting higher financial confidence would indicate progress.

2. For SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth)

   • Indicator for Target 8.5: Job creation numbers.

     The article explicitly and repeatedly refers to the “jobs number” and the “number of jobs added in the economy” from the BLS jobs report as the primary metric for the health of the labor market.

   • Indicator for Target 8.3: Economic growth rate.

     The article mentions that “economic growth actually was up from the prior quarter,” using it as a key data point to assess the overall state of the economy, separate from the labor market data.

3. For SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions)

   • Indicator for Target 16.6: Political independence and public trust in national statistical offices.

     This is a central theme. The article implies this indicator through the discussion of the BLS head being “abruptly fired” and the White House claiming data was “rigged.” The reaction from “economists and labor experts” calling the move “catastrophic” serves as a measure of the perceived loss of institutional independence.

   • Indicator for Target 16.7: Timeliness and reliability of official statistics.

     The article details the BLS process of releasing preliminary data and subsequent revisions to “inform decision-making” in a timely manner. The threat to this process implies that the reliability and timely availability of this data is a key indicator of institutional performance.

4. Table of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: hermoney.com