DeForest Chamber joins school district for Lunch and Learn – hngnews.com

Report on DeForest Area School District Referendum Fund Allocation

Introduction

This report details the allocation of a recurring $7.9 million operational referendum approved by the community for the DeForest Area School District. The information was presented during a Chamber of Commerce event on September 25. The district’s financial strategy demonstrates a significant commitment to achieving several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Strategic Allocation Aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

The referendum funds are designated for five key areas, each contributing to specific SDGs aimed at creating a sustainable and equitable future.

Core Investment Areas and SDG Impact

• Instruction and Programming: This initiative directly supports SDG 4 (Quality Education) by enhancing educational programs and ensuring all students have access to equitable and high-quality learning opportunities.
• Facilities Maintenance: Investment in facilities maintenance aligns with SDG 4, Target 4.a, which calls for building and upgrading education facilities to be safe, inclusive, and effective learning environments. It also contributes to SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) by maintaining essential public infrastructure.
• Technology: Funding for technology advances SDG 4 by integrating modern tools into the curriculum. It also supports SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) by increasing access to information and communications technology for students and staff.
• Staff Retention: This objective is crucial for SDG 4, Target 4.c, which focuses on increasing the supply of qualified teachers. By ensuring staff retention, the district also promotes SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) through stable and fair employment.
• Safety: Enhancing school safety directly addresses SDG 4, Target 4.a, by ensuring a non-violent and secure learning environment. This commitment also reinforces SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) by fostering safety within a key community institution.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

   • SDG 4: Quality Education is the primary goal addressed in the article. The text exclusively discusses the allocation of funds from a referendum to the DeForest Area School district. The stated purposes of these funds, such as “supporting instruction and programming, maintaining facilities, technology, staff retention and safety,” are all core components of ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

   • Target 4.a: Build and upgrade education facilities that are child, disability and gender sensitive and provide safe, non-violent, inclusive and effective learning environments for all. The article directly connects to this target by stating that the referendum funds will be used for “maintaining facilities” and ensuring “safety” within the school district. This demonstrates a commitment to providing a secure and effective learning environment.
   • Target 4.c: By 2030, substantially increase the supply of qualified teachers, including through international cooperation for teacher training in developing countries, especially least developed countries and small island developing States. While the context is not a developing country, the principle of ensuring a stable and qualified teaching workforce is universal. The article’s mention of using funds for “staff retention” directly supports the goal of maintaining a sufficient supply of qualified educators to deliver quality instruction.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

   • The article does not provide explicit quantitative data but implies indicators that could be used to measure progress.
   • Implied Indicator for Target 4.a: The commitment to “maintaining facilities” and “safety” implies that progress could be measured by the physical condition of school buildings, the implementation of safety upgrades, and a reduction in safety-related incidents. The “$7.9 million operational referendum” itself serves as a financial input indicator for this target.
   • Implied Indicator for Target 4.c: The goal of “staff retention” directly implies that a key performance indicator would be the school district’s staff and teacher retention/turnover rate. A successful outcome would be a stable or increased retention rate for qualified staff.

4. SDGs, Targets and Indicators Table

   SDGs	Targets	Indicators (Implied from the article)
   SDG 4: Quality Education	Target 4.a: Build and upgrade education facilities and provide safe, inclusive and effective learning environments for all.	The allocation of funds for “maintaining facilities” and “safety,” with the $7.9 million referendum serving as a financial input indicator.
   SDG 4: Quality Education	Target 4.c: Substantially increase the supply of qualified teachers.	The district’s staff retention rate, as the article explicitly mentions “staff retention” as a key goal of the funding.

Source: hngnews.com