BLOG: Modernized permitting is needed to incentivize energy investments in California – The Business Journal

Report on Regulatory Frameworks and Sustainable Development in California’s Energy Sector

Executive Summary

An analysis of the business environment in California’s Central Valley reveals that existing federal regulatory frameworks present significant barriers to achieving key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Outdated and inefficient permitting processes in the energy sector impede progress on SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure). This report outlines the challenges posed by current legislation and recommends federal permitting reform as a critical step to unlock private investment, accelerate essential infrastructure projects, and foster sustainable, inclusive growth in the region and across the state.

Analysis of Current Challenges to Sustainable Development

Business leaders in the Central Valley report that regulatory impediments are the primary constraint on local and regional development. These challenges directly conflict with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

• Impediments to SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy): Energy prices in California have surged, with electricity costs increasing by 96% over the last decade, making it the second most expensive state for energy. This undermines Target 7.1, which aims to ensure universal access to affordable, reliable, and modern energy services.
• Constraints on SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure): Rising energy demands from innovative sectors like AI and advanced manufacturing are placing significant strain on aging electrical grids. Permitting delays and uncertainty halt the necessary private investment required to build resilient and modern infrastructure, as called for in Target 9.1.
• Barriers to SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth): Entrepreneurs and business owners are unable to expand operations, create jobs, and invest in communities due to prohibitive red tape. This stagnation hinders the promotion of sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth and full and productive employment, which is the core objective of SDG 8.

The Role of Outdated Legal Frameworks in Hindering SDG Progress

The primary legislative instruments identified as obstructing sustainable development are the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA). Their current application fails to align with the principles of effective and accountable institutions (SDG 16).

1. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): Originally intended to protect the environment, NEPA’s unmodernized provisions have made it a tool for prolonged litigation. This stalls projects crucial for energy security and infrastructure development, delaying environmental and economic benefits rather than ensuring them. A reform is needed to restore its purpose in line with SDG 16’s call for effective institutions.
2. The Clean Water Act (CWA): The CWA is increasingly utilized to block or delay critical infrastructure projects based on ideological agendas rather than genuine environmental concerns. This misuse of a vital environmental law creates uncertainty and undermines the rule of law, contradicting the principles of SDG 16.

Recommendations for Aligning Policy with Sustainable Development Goals

To address these challenges, federal legislative action is required to modernize the permitting process. These reforms should be designed to create a regulatory environment that facilitates progress toward the SDGs.

• Modernize NEPA: Congress should update NEPA to focus reviews on substantive environmental impacts, establish proportional and predictable timelines for project approvals, and limit frivolous litigation. This will strengthen institutional effectiveness (SDG 16) and accelerate the development of sustainable infrastructure (SDG 9).
• Clarify the Clean Water Act: Legislative action is needed to clarify the scope of the CWA and establish clear timelines. This will provide certainty for regulators and developers, preventing the law’s misuse and ensuring that development proceeds in an environmentally responsible and predictable manner, supporting both SDG 9 and SDG 16.

Projected Outcomes of Permitting Reform on SDG Attainment

Implementing faster and more efficient permitting processes is projected to yield significant benefits across multiple Sustainable Development Goals.

• Advancement of SDG 7: By reducing delays, reform will lower the costs of energy projects, contributing to more affordable energy for consumers and businesses.
• Stimulation of SDG 8: A streamlined process will unlock private investment, creating jobs in construction, manufacturing, and technology, thereby fostering robust economic growth.
• Enhancement of SDG 9: Reform will accelerate the modernization of the energy grid and other critical infrastructure, making it more reliable and resilient to future demands.
• Strengthening of SDG 11: Lower energy costs and increased economic opportunity will improve the quality of life and enhance the sustainability of communities throughout California.

Conclusion: A Call for Legislative Action

The current regulatory environment is misaligned with California’s sustainable development needs. Federal permitting reform represents a bipartisan opportunity to modernize outdated laws, cut prohibitive red tape, and create a framework that supports environmental protection while simultaneously advancing goals for affordable energy, economic growth, and resilient infrastructure. It is imperative that Congress acts to implement these durable reforms to unlock California’s full potential for sustainable and inclusive prosperity.

Analysis of the Article in Relation to Sustainable Development Goals

1. SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy

   • The article’s central theme is the challenge of high energy costs and the need for reliable energy in California. It explicitly states, “energy prices have surged in recent years,” and residents “are desperate for reliable and affordable energy.” This directly connects to the goal of ensuring access to affordable and reliable energy for all.

2. SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

   • The author links energy policy reform directly to economic opportunities. The article begins by stating that business owners “want to grow, hire, and invest in our communities.” It argues that permitting reform would “unleash private investment,” “create jobs,” and allow “innovation, investment, and opportunity can flourish.” This aligns with the goal of promoting sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth and productive employment.

3. SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

   • The article highlights issues with “aging infrastructure” and an electric grid “pushed to their limits.” A primary argument is that reforming permitting processes for laws like NEPA and the CWA is necessary to “accelerate critical projects” and “accelerate infrastructure developments.” This focus on building resilient infrastructure and fostering innovation is a core component of SDG 9.

Specific SDG Targets Identified

1. Target 7.1: Ensure universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy services.

   • The article directly addresses this target by highlighting the lack of affordability and reliability. It cites that “electricity costs have nearly doubled, soaring 96 percent” and that the proposed reforms would lower energy costs and make the grid “more dependable.”

2. Target 8.3: Promote development-oriented policies that support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity and innovation.

   • The article advocates for policy changes (federal permitting reform) to remove “red tape” that stands in the way of business owners who “want to grow, hire, and invest.” The author argues these reforms would create jobs and allow entrepreneurs to expand, directly supporting this target.

3. Target 9.1: Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure…to support economic development and human well-being.

   • The discussion of “aging infrastructure” and a strained electric grid points to the need for developing more reliable infrastructure. The article’s call to “accelerate infrastructure developments” through smarter permitting is a direct effort to achieve this target to support the state’s economic needs.

Indicators for Measuring Progress

1. Indicator: Price of electricity for consumers.

   • The article explicitly mentions that “electricity costs have nearly doubled, soaring 96 percent” and that Californians “face the second most expensive energy prices in the entire nation.” This metric is a direct indicator of progress towards energy affordability (Target 7.1). A decrease in this percentage or a drop in the national ranking would signify progress.

2. Indicator: Time required for project permitting and litigation.

   • The article implies this indicator by complaining about “delayed permits” and projects being “tied up in lawsuits that last years.” Measuring the average time from project proposal to approval for energy infrastructure projects would be a key indicator of whether the “red tape” mentioned is being reduced, aligning with the goal of facilitating infrastructure development (Target 9.1).

3. Indicator: Level of private investment in the energy sector.

   • The author claims that current barriers “halt investment” and that reform would “unleash private investment.” Tracking the amount of private capital flowing into California’s energy sector would serve as an indicator of the success of these proposed policies in stimulating economic growth (Target 8.3).

Summary Table of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: thebusinessjournal.com