Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt Legal Battle
 "Brad Pitt hits back at Angelina Jolie over her latest physical abuse claims, demands to prove it in court")
Apart from claims of physical abuse, Angelina Jolie’s legal team alleged that Brad Pitt prohibited her from selling her shares in the winery until she signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA)
Introduction
Angelina Jolie has recently accused her ex-husband Brad Pitt of physical abuse. In response, Brad Pitt has challenged Jolie to prove her claims in court. The ongoing legal battle between the two has reached a critical point, with the court granting Pitt the opportunity to challenge Jolie for not honoring their “first refusal” agreement.
Allegations and Counterarguments
In addition to the claims of physical abuse, Jolie’s legal team has accused Pitt of preventing her from selling her shares in the winery unless she signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA).
Now, Brad Pitt’s lawyers aim to prove that the NDA requested by their client was not more restrictive than the ones routinely requested by Jolie from other individuals.
Legal Analysis
Brad Pitt’s lawyer stated in a court filing, “For example, if Jolie conditioned her continued employment of an individual on that individual’s agreement to an NDA covering what they witnessed in her home — including her treatment of her children and Pitt — that would be highly probative of whether she truly believed the provision requested by Pitt was an ‘unconscionable gag order’.”
The filing further mentioned, “The same is true with respect to any NDA between Jolie and any third party with whom she is in a relationship or who has assisted with the care of the couple’s children. To the extent that Jolie requested this third party’s silence about her family or homelife, particularly in a circumstance where there was no business justification, it would speak volumes about whether Jolie actually viewed Pitt’s requested NDA, which was linked to the Miraval business, as the deal-ender she subsequently alleged it to be.”
Main Focus of the Case
Brad Pitt responded to Jolie’s claims of physical abuse before the 2016 plane accident, stating, “This case isn’t about what took place on a plane in 2016. It’s about whether they had an agreement not to sell their interests in the winery and family home without the other’s consent. That’s what Brad and his team are focused on.”
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
-
SDG 5: Gender Equality
- Target 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in the public and private spheres
- Indicator: Number of women who have experienced physical or sexual violence by a partner in the past 12 months
-
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
- Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all
- Indicator: Proportion of population who have experienced a dispute in the past two years and who accessed a formal or informal dispute resolution mechanism, by type of mechanism
Analysis
The article discusses the legal battle between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, focusing on allegations of physical abuse and the non-disclosure agreement (NDA) related to the winery they co-own. Based on the content of the article, the following SDGs, targets, and indicators can be identified:
1. SDG 5: Gender Equality
The issue of physical abuse raised by Angelina Jolie is connected to SDG 5, which aims to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. Target 5.2 specifically addresses the elimination of all forms of violence against women and girls in both public and private spheres. The article mentions Jolie’s claims of physical abuse by Brad Pitt, highlighting the relevance of this SDG to the issues discussed.
2. SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
The legal battle between Jolie and Pitt involves disputes and access to justice, which aligns with SDG 16. Target 16.3 focuses on promoting the rule of law and ensuring equal access to justice for all. The article mentions the court proceedings and the challenge faced by Jolie for not honoring the “first refusal” agreement, indicating the relevance of this SDG to the issues discussed.
Indicators
The article does not explicitly mention specific indicators related to the identified targets. However, potential indicators that can be used to measure progress towards these targets include:
- Number of women who have experienced physical or sexual violence by a partner in the past 12 months (related to SDG 5, Target 5.2)
- Proportion of population who have experienced a dispute in the past two years and who accessed a formal or informal dispute resolution mechanism, by type of mechanism (related to SDG 16, Target 16.3)
Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
| SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 5: Gender Equality | Target 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in the public and private spheres | Number of women who have experienced physical or sexual violence by a partner in the past 12 months |
| SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions | Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all | Proportion of population who have experienced a dispute in the past two years and who accessed a formal or informal dispute resolution mechanism, by type of mechanism |
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: firstpost.com
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.
