How a new police & fire partnership is helping Wisconsin Rapids’ most vulnerable residents – Daily Tribune Media

Report on Fatal Road Incident and its Relation to Sustainable Development Goals

Incident Overview

A fatal vehicular collision occurred in October 2016 on State 80 in Wood County, Wisconsin. The incident directly contravenes key objectives outlined in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly those concerning public health, safety, and justice.

• Perpetrator: Gregory A. Kopelke, 31, was operating a Jeep Cherokee while under the influence of methamphetamine.
• Action: The driver crossed the center line, resulting in a head-on collision with another vehicle.
• Victims: The crash resulted in the deaths of two sisters, Barbara Baldwin, 71, and Louise Hemenway, 74. A third sister, 72, sustained extensive injuries.
• Context: The three victims were en route to celebrate the conclusion of a successful course of chemotherapy treatment for one of the sisters.

Judicial Response and Sentencing

The case was adjudicated in Wood County court, where the perpetrator’s actions were deemed intentional due to the deliberate use of illicit substances before driving. The outcome reflects the justice system’s role in addressing actions that undermine community safety and well-being, a core tenet of SDG 16.

• Charges: Two counts of homicide and one count of causing injury by driving under the influence.
• Sentence: Mr. Kopelke was sentenced to 24 years in prison, followed by 26 years of extended supervision.
• Judicial Remarks: The presiding judge noted that the driver had previously completed a drug-treatment program and was driving with a revoked license, indicating a failure of preventative measures and a disregard for the rule of law.

Relevance to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This case serves as a critical example of challenges faced in achieving several SDGs at the community level.

SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

The incident represents a significant failure in promoting health and well-being through public safety measures.

1. Target 3.6: The death of two individuals and the severe injury of a third directly oppose the goal of halving global deaths and injuries from road traffic accidents.
2. Target 3.5: The collision was a direct result of substance abuse. The perpetrator’s relapse after completing a treatment program highlights the systemic challenges in strengthening the prevention and treatment of narcotic drug abuse.

SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

The legal proceedings underscore the importance of strong institutions while also revealing weaknesses in enforcement.

1. Target 16.1: The incident contributes to the local death rate, an issue this goal aims to reduce significantly.
2. Target 16.3: While the sentencing demonstrates the promotion of the rule of law, the fact that the perpetrator was driving with a revoked license points to a lapse in enforcement, which is critical for ensuring justice and public safety.

SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities

The safety of transportation systems is a key component of sustainable communities.

• Target 11.2: This event is a stark illustration of a failure to ensure a safe transport system for all road users. It highlights that achieving road safety is dependent not only on infrastructure but also on addressing dangerous driver behavior such as operating a vehicle under the influence of narcotics.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

  This goal is central to the article, which discusses a fatal car crash resulting in death and severe injury. The cause of the crash, methamphetamine abuse, directly relates to substance abuse issues. Furthermore, the victims were on their way to celebrate the end of a chemotherapy treatment, highlighting the broader context of health and well-being.

• SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

  This goal is addressed through the article’s detailed account of the legal and judicial response to the crime. It describes the sentencing of the perpetrator, the judge’s reasoning, and the role of the justice system in holding individuals accountable and protecting the public, thereby promoting the rule of law.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• Target 3.5: Strengthen the prevention and treatment of substance abuse, including narcotic drug abuse and harmful use of alcohol.

  The article explicitly states the crash was caused by a “man high on methamphetamine.” It further details his struggle with addiction, noting he “had never been in the grips of a worse addiction than that of methamphetamine” and had previously “graduated from a drug-treatment court after having faced 11 drug charges.” This directly points to the challenges of substance abuse prevention and treatment failure.

• Target 3.6: By 2030, halve the number of global deaths and injuries from road traffic accidents.

  The core event of the article is a head-on collision that “killed the driver, Barbara Baldwin, 71, and her sister, Louise Hemenway, 74” and caused “extensive injuries” to a third sister. This incident is a direct example of the road traffic deaths and injuries that this target aims to reduce.

• Target 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere.

  The judge’s statement, “I don’t believe this was an accident,” and the subsequent conviction on “two counts of homicide” frame the incident not as a mere accident but as a preventable act of violence resulting from criminal negligence. The deaths are a direct outcome of this act, aligning with the target’s focus on reducing related death rates.

• Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all.

  The article details the functioning of the justice system. The perpetrator was tried and sentenced by a “Wood County Judge” who delivered a sentence of “24 years in prison…plus 26 years of extended supervision.” This process demonstrates the application of the rule of law to hold an individual accountable for his actions.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

• Indicator 3.6.1: Death rate due to road traffic injuries.

  The article provides specific data points for this indicator by stating that the crash resulted in two deaths and one person with extensive injuries. This is the type of data used to calculate the overall death and injury rate from road traffic accidents.

• Implied Indicator for Target 3.5: Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programs.

  The article implies a measure of treatment failure. The judge noted that the perpetrator was “given all the tools to remain clean and sober” through a drug-treatment court but ultimately relapsed (“You decided to use again”). This highlights the challenge of recidivism and the need to measure the long-term effectiveness of treatment interventions for substance abuse.

• Implied Indicator for Target 16.1: Number of victims of intentional homicide.

  The article states the perpetrator was sentenced on “two counts of homicide.” The two deaths are a direct measure of the “related death rates” mentioned in the target. While not a premeditated murder, the legal classification as homicide due to a criminal act provides a quantifiable measure relevant to this indicator.

• Implied Indicator for Target 16.3: Functioning of the criminal justice system.

  The article provides tangible evidence of the justice system in action. The specific sentence (“24 years in prison”), the revocation of the driver’s license for five years, and the order to pay restitution are all measurable outcomes that demonstrate the state’s capacity to adjudicate crimes and enforce the rule of law.

4. Summary Table of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: wisconsinrapidstribune.com