Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Plant-Based Alternatives to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
With the surging global concerns over climate change and rapid deforestation, an important new study suggests a potential remedy that lies in our diets. According to recent research published in Nature Communications, swapping half of our meat and milk consumption with plant-based alternatives by 2050 could drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 31% and stall the degradation of forests and natural terrains.
Going a step further, the research suggests that additional environmental advantages could come from the reforestation of areas previously dedicated to livestock production. This action could amplify the climate benefits, cutting down the prospective degradation of ecosystems by 50% by mid-century.
Impressively, such efforts in reforestation could address up to a quarter of the global land restoration targets set for 2030 under Target 2 of the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Global study of plant-based foods
This monumental study is the inaugural exploration into the environmental and food security ramifications of large-scale adoption of plant-based meat and milk alternatives. A truly global undertaking, the study was conducted independently by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in collaboration with the Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT, USAID. The group also sought insights from Impossible Foods, a pioneering entity in the plant-based meat substitute industry.
It’s pertinent to mention that the research remained autonomous, even with inputs from Impossible Foods. “The data are, however, not specific to Impossible Foods and the science team had complete control over decision making,” the release stated.
Marta Kozicka is the study’s lead author from IIASA’s Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program. She emphasized the significance of the research, stating that “Understanding the impacts of dietary shifts expands our options for reducing GHG emissions. Shifting diets could also yield huge improvements for biodiversity.”
Furthermore, Eva Wollenberg, a study co-author, and researcher from Alliance of Bioversity International, CIAT, and the Gund Institute at the University of Vermont, added, “Plant-based meats are not just a novel food product, but a critical opportunity for achieving food security and climate goals while also achieving health and biodiversity objectives worldwide.”
What the research team learned
The research paints an optimistic picture. In scenarios where 50% of meat and milk products are replaced with plant-based alternatives, significant environmental benefits could be observed by 2050.
- A 12% reduction in global agricultural area.
- A near-total halt in the decline of forest and natural lands.
- Nitrogen inputs to farmlands could be halved.
- A 10% drop in water usage.
- A 31% reduction in GHG emissions (2.1 Gt CO2eq year-1) by 2050.
- A decline in global undernourishment to 3.6%.
Moreover, if lands saved from livestock production were to undergo “biodiversity-minded afforestation”, the benefits in terms of reduced emissions could double. In a more ambitious 90% substitution scenario, GHG emission reductions could reach a staggering 11.1 Gt CO2eq year-1 by 2050.
Petr Havlík, who directed the study at IIASA, pointed out the essential balance between dietary changes and production side policies. He cautioned, “Otherwise, these benefits will be partly lost due to production extensification and resulting GHG and land-use efficiency losses.”
Plant-based dietary shifts would vary
Yet, the study also emphasized that shifts in diets would not uniformly affect all regions. They cited disparities in population, diets, agricultural productivity, and trade.
The most noticeable effects on agricultural input are likely in China, while environmental outcomes would be more pronounced in Sub-Saharan Africa and South America. Kozicka added, “A global introduction of all novel alternatives has additional benefits compared to the scenarios with limited product or geographical scope.”
It’s essential, however, to recognize the multifaceted role of livestock in diverse cultures and economies, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Livestock play a vital role in the livelihoods, nutrition, and culture of many communities.
In conclusion, while plant-based meat alternatives are promising, ensuring a just and sustainable transition for all stakeholders, particularly smallholder farmers facing the brunt of climate change, is of paramount importance. The world’s food security hangs in the balance, and the time for decisive action is now.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
-
SDG 13: Climate Action
- Target 13.2: Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning
- Target 13.3: Improve education, awareness-raising, and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction, and early warning
- Target 13.8: Promote mechanisms to raise capacity for planning and management in least developed countries and small island developing states
The article addresses the issue of climate change and its connection to meat and milk consumption. It suggests that swapping half of our meat and milk consumption with plant-based alternatives could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 31%, which aligns with SDG 13’s targets of integrating climate change measures into policies and raising awareness on climate change mitigation.
-
SDG 15: Life on Land
- Target 15.1: By 2020, ensure the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services
- Target 15.2: By 2020, promote the implementation of sustainable management of all types of forests, halt deforestation, restore degraded forests, and substantially increase afforestation and reforestation globally
- Target 15.5: Take urgent and significant action to reduce degradation of natural habitats
The article highlights the potential environmental benefits of replacing meat and milk consumption with plant-based alternatives, including a near-total halt in the decline of forests and natural lands. This aligns with SDG 15’s targets of halting deforestation, restoring degraded forests, and reducing degradation of natural habitats.
-
SDG 2: Zero Hunger
- Target 2.1: By 2030, end hunger and ensure access by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious, and sufficient food all year round
- Target 2.2: By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving, by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under 5 years of age, and address the nutritional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant and lactating women, and older persons
The article mentions that a decline in global undernourishment to 3.6% could be observed if 50% of meat and milk products are replaced with plant-based alternatives. This aligns with SDG 2’s targets of ending hunger and ensuring access to safe and nutritious food for all.
| SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 13: Climate Action |
|
No specific indicators mentioned in the article. |
| SDG 15: Life on Land |
|
No specific indicators mentioned in the article. |
| SDG 2: Zero Hunger |
|
No specific indicators mentioned in the article. |
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: earth.com
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.
