Ageism: A Barrier to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
By Jang Won-Seok
The author is a stock market news reporter of the JoongAng Ilbo.
Ageism, defined by American geriatrician Robert Butler in 1969, refers to the stereotyping and discrimination based on age. It is not limited to old age but encompasses discrimination against various age groups. In Korean society, derogatory terms such as “choding” for elementary school students and negative attitudes towards Gen MZ are prevalent.
Ageism is deeply rooted in our society, often perpetuated unknowingly. Similar to gender and racial discrimination, it is important to address and combat ageism to promote equality and inclusivity.
Recently, Kim Eun-kyung, chair of the Democratic Party’s innovation committee, faced criticism for suggesting that voting rights should be determined based on the remaining years of a person’s life. Although she claimed it was her son’s idea, her endorsement of the concept implies support. Additionally, Rep. Yang Yiwonyoung’s comment that “many people who are voting now won’t be alive in the future” reflects a concerning mindset that values age and headcount solely for electoral purposes.
What is even more alarming is the nonchalant attitude towards the issue of aging. In just two years, the share of the elderly population aged 65 or older in Korea will exceed 20%, making it a super-aged society. This demographic shift not only poses challenges to economic growth but also impacts labor, pensions, and healthcare systems. If left unaddressed, it will become an immense burden for future generations.
Fortunately, Bradley Schurman, a demographic futurist, offers a refreshing perspective in his book “Super Age.” He argues that an aging society can be viewed as an opportunity rather than a crisis. However, he emphasizes the need to overcome ageism as a prerequisite for the success of “elderomics,” which involves the active participation of older individuals in labor and consumption. The book presents various ideas, including the expansion of “returnship,” that are worth considering.
If we genuinely care about the well-being of future generations, it is crucial to educate ourselves and seek knowledge. Politicians should focus their efforts on addressing issues like ageism rather than solely calculating votes.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
---|---|---|
SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities | Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age | No specific indicators mentioned in the article |
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being | Target 3.8: Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential healthcare services, and access to safe, effective, quality, and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all | No specific indicators mentioned in the article |
SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth | Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value | No specific indicators mentioned in the article |
Analysis
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
The issues highlighted in the article are connected to SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities, SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being, and SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth.
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
Based on the article’s content, the specific targets that can be identified are:
– Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age.
– Target 3.8: Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential healthcare services, and access to safe, effective, quality, and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all.
– Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value.
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
No specific indicators are mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets.
Please note that the article does not provide specific information or data related to indicators for measuring progress towards the identified targets.
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: koreajoongangdaily.joins.com
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.